QUESTIONS? CALL: 1-242-326-6400

Blog Posts

The Witness Statement in Bahamian Litigation

Posted by M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola | Aug 31, 2017 | 0 Comments

The witness statement in bahamian litigation

In The Bahamas, the parties to a lawsuit gather witness statements prior to trial to help them prove their claims or defences. In general, these statements capture the personal observations of direct witnesses to the events that surround the dispute.

Difficulties may arise when using a witness statement if the witness did not personally observe or know the facts set out  in the witness statement. When a witness attempts to testify to or declare facts that he heard about from a person who was present, this is an example of hearsay. (Evidence Act, Sect. 38.) Hearsay generally is not admissible in court, subject to a number of specific exceptions. (Evidence Act, Sect. 39.) Sometimes, witnesses state opinions about what they observed. For an opinion by a witness not qualified as an expert to be admissible as evidence of what was observed, it must serve to convey relevant facts personally observed by the witness. (Evidence Act, Sect. 26.)

To avoid hearsay issues in court, your witness statements ideally should come from direct observers, such as a person who was present during the dispute, and be obtained as close in time to the events they observed as possible. In commercial disputes, this may require obtaining statements from various employees who performed acts on behalf of a company, even if the employee was located in a different country or no longer works there. However, if you obtained the statement of a witness who is now dead, missing, or too ill or incapacitated to testify at trial, the judge conducting the trial may allow use of the statement in court.

At trial, the parties use witness statements as evidence in chief to support their claims or defences. Each witness who produced a statement may be cross-examined by the opposing party about the information contained in the witness statement. Technically, cross-examination should be limited to matters mentioned in or arising from the witness statement. Witnesses may be called to testify directly instead of using the witness statement, in which case the court may decide not to admit the witness statement into evidence.

To find out more, visit Gonsalves-Sabola Chambers online or call the office at +1 242 326 6400.

About the Author

M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola

M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola is a civil and commercial litigation attorney and an accredited civil and commercial mediator. Margaret has over 21 years' experience in legal practice in the United Kingdom, Jamaica and The Bahamas.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Why Choose Us

We care. We communicate. We prepare. We get the job done.

Menu