Blog Posts

How Is Repudiation of a Contract Different than Termination?

Posted by M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola | Sep 17, 2018 | 0 Comments

A contract can be brought to an end in a number of ways. The concept of terminating a contract encompasses different actions a party could perform contrary to the parties' intent when they signed the contract: breach of an essential term, serious breach of a non-essential term, mutual agreement to end the contract, a contractual term providing for termination, and finally repudiation.

A party repudiates a contract when he shows an unwillingness to perform the contract or an intention not to be bound by the contract's terms. The party could tell other parties to the contract that it does not intend to perform its obligations, or it could simply act in such a way that shows an intention not to perform. Usually repudiation is anticipatory, meaning it happens before the party is due to perform an obligation under the contract.

If one party to a contract anticipatorily repudiates it, other parties may be entitled to terminate the contract if they wish. Termination of the contract effectively discharges the other parties' obligations to perform the contract terms. Before termination, it is a good idea for the other parties to notify the repudiating party and request that it comply with the contract terms (this will be discussed in the next blog). Doing so could avoid a dispute if the repudiating party then begins to perform their obligations under the contract.

Sometimes, a party will indicate that it refuses to perform only part of the contract. In that case a court would examine whether only partial performance would still breach a material term of the contract or deprive the other party of the majority of the contract's benefits. This may be considered a breach of an essential or non-essential term, rather than a full repudiation of the entire contract.

Sometimes, one party misunderstands the terms of a contract. For example, a contract for the sale of goods between two companies could say that payment will be made by the 15th day of each month for shipments received on the 1st. If one company repeatedly asserts that it will make payment “as soon as it has the money”, the other company could interpret this statement as a repudiation. The first company is mistaken about the contract's terms.

In this situation, the second company should attempt to correct the first company's mistaken impression and remind it what the contract says. Otherwise, if the second company does not perform its obligations because it views the statement as a repudiation, a court could interpret the second company's actions as a repudiation instead.

In short, when dealing with potential repudiation of contracts, clear communication between parties is essential to preventing disputes. If you believe that a party to one of your contracts has anticipatorily repudiated it, consult an attorney before you take further steps to terminate the contract.

To find out more about repudiating and terminating contracts, visit Gonsalves-Sabola Chambers online or call the office at +1 242 326 6400.

About the Author

M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola

M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola is a civil and commercial litigation attorney and an accredited civil and commercial mediator. Margaret has over 21 years' experience in legal practice in the United Kingdom, Jamaica and The Bahamas.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment