Blog Posts

Protecting Assets Against Judgment Creditors – What Not To Do

Posted by M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola | Feb 13, 2018 | 0 Comments

Protecting your assets against judgment creditors requires professional advice to set up irrevocable, discretionary trusts, gift money to others, or use other common asset protection techniques. You should understand that completely sealing off assets from creditor access often is difficult if you seek to retain any control over the assets. Most importantly, there are many steps that you should not take to protect assets because they are illegal in The Bahamas.

Often, people sued in court are caught unawares by the lawsuit and have not previously employed asset protection measures. Eager to prevent plaintiffs from obtaining judgments and then seizing defendants' assets to satisfy the judgment, defendants start selling off property to relatives and moving money into offshore bank accounts. If they take these actions with the intent to avoid paying a plaintiff who obtains an adverse judgment against them, these dispositions of their assets could be set aside under the Fraudulent Dispositions Act, 1991.

Under the Fraudulent Dispositions Act, 1991, dispositions of property made “with an intent to defraud” and for less than their market value are voidable (meaning they can be set aside) if a creditor who will not be paid as a result of the transfer requests it. An intent to defraud means the “intention of a transferor wilfully to defeat an obligation owed to a creditor”, as in the case of moving money around to avoid paying a judgment debt. Fraudulent Dispositions Act, 1991, Sections 4 & 2.

Creditors bear the burden of proving that the disposition (e.g., a transfer or sale) of the property was done with the intent to defraud, and they must bring an action within two years of the date the disposition occurred. If a disposition is voided (set aside or overturned) by the court, the person to whom the property was transferred or sold, known as the transferee, will have a charge over the property in the amount of the costs incurred to void the disposition or to defend the court action. If the disposition resulted in a distribution to a beneficiary of a trust, generally the beneficiary may keep the distribution. However, if the court finds that the transferee or beneficiary acted in bad faith, such as by conspiring with the debtor to hide assets, the court does not have to allow a charge or uphold a distribution. Fraudulent Dispositions Act, 1991, Sections 4 & 5.

Dispositions of property that are not owned by the debtor and over which the debtor cannot exercise any rights do not fall under the Fraudulent Dispositions Act's provisions for purposes of that debtor. Even so, debtors usually should avoid instructing other people (such as a husband or wife) to move money around to put the debtor in a more advantageous situation in relation to the judgment creditor. Attempting to avoid paying a judgment debt as the result of a lawsuit could put the debtor in more trouble than he was in initially.

To find out more about asset protection and enforcing judgment debts, visit Gonsalves-Sabola Chambers online or call the office at +1 242 326 6400.

About the Author

M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola

M. Margaret Gonsalves-Sabola is a civil and commercial litigation attorney and an accredited civil and commercial mediator. Margaret has over 21 years' experience in legal practice in the United Kingdom, Jamaica and The Bahamas.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment